Vol. 6, No. 2 - June 1997
- Water Efficiency -
- North Carolina's Water Supply: A Case for Water Efficiency
- Water Efficiency: Sizing Up Your Facility
- Water Efficiency: Cooling Towers
- Water Resources on the Internet ...
- One Water Utility's Approach ...
- Efficiencies in Facility Domestic Water Use Offer Cost Savings Potential
- Landscape Irrigation
- Water Efficiency Case Studies
Water supplies in many areas of North Carolina are in serious jeopardy. For example, underground water supply reservoirs in eastern North Carolina are dropping by as much as eight feet a year, land surfaces are settling as water is withdrawn, and the potential exists for salt water intrusion into underground drinking water supplies. In the Piedmont area, nearly all available supplies from surface water reservoirs are currently allocated to municipalities. And across North Carolina, the potential for water shortages is increasingly likely.
According to the University of North Carolina Water Resources Research Institute, approximately 4 million North Carolinians rely on groundwater (aquifers) for their daily water supply, and approximately 3.2 million rely on surface water (rivers and lakes). At an average daily consumption of 60 gallons per person, approximately 240 million gallons of groundwater and 192 million gallons of surface water are withdrawn daily for residential uses. The United States Geological Survey estimated that North Carolina industrial and commercial sectors used 332 million gallons per day from publicly supplied sources in 1995. In addition to these uses, the state's water balance also includes minimum quantities of water required to sustain aquatic life in our rivers and streams - of utmost importance to the state's fishing industry, tourism, recreation, and quality of life.
In response to increased water supply demands and to extend raw water supplies and reduce potential drought periods that are beginning to plague North Carolina areas, several municipalities and water/sewer districts have implemented water efficiency programs. Table 1 lists substantial benefits that can be achieved through these programs.
Table 1. Benefits of Water Efficiency Programs |
|
Water use rate structures can greatly influence efficiency efforts. Trends over the past 10 years show many municipalities moving away from traditional "declining block" rate structures in which the more water users consume, the less they pay. Alternative rate structures such as "uniform" and "inverted block" make efficiency measures more economically advantageous, although almost 52 percent of large municipalities still use declining block rate structures.
Efficiency efforts need to be coordinated among the municipalities and districts that share a river basin and aquifers. North Carolina has been taking steps to improve the accountability and coordination of water use in the state. In 1989, the General Assembly passed a bill that addresses local and state water supply planning. Several bills and rules related to water management have been and are being passed. They include the reuse of reclaimed wastewater (FOCUS, Fall 1996), water supply watershed protection, the Water Use Act, the Coastal Area Management Act, and Basinwide Water Quality Planning.
This edition of FOCUS provides guidance and examples on the sound water efficiency practices businesses and industries can use to support the state's water management efforts.
Water efficiency measures implemented by industrial and commercial facilities can be cost effective as well as environmentally sustainable. Some of the reasons to use water efficiently include preservation of quality water supplies; cost savings in water, sewer, chemical treatment, and energy; expansion of production without increased water use; and delay in the need for new water supplies.
In sizing up the efforts your facility is making in water efficiency, consider the following questions and suggestions for establishing a water efficiency program.
Top Management Commitment and Resources |
|
Water Efficiency Survey |
|
Identify Water Reduction Opportunities |
|
Water Efficiency Action Plan |
|
Tracking and Communicating Results |
|
For more information on water efficiency measures, contact the Division of Pollution Prevention and Environmental Assistance at (919) 715-6500. |
|
| It is not uncommon for cooling towers to consume 20 to 30 percent of the water supplied to commercial and industrial facilities. Water savings can be achieved by reducing blowdown or water discharges from cooling towers. Consider the following water-saving suggestions: | ![]() |
- Install an automatic control to shut off the unit when facility is unoccupied (night or weekend hours) or to operate it concurrently with chillers.
- Inspect drift losses. If excessive, install drift eliminators or repair existing equipment.
- Improve operation:
- Install flowmeters on make-up and bleed-off lines to verify that the tower is operating within specified limits. Meters that display instantaneous flow will be very useful.
- Operate bleed-off valve on a continuous basis to prevent wide fluctuations in conductivity, which typically cause the average conductivity to be much lower than the desired value. Continuous bleed-off maintains the conductivity of the tower; reduces the chemical requirements; eliminates the possibility that water will exceed the preset, conductivity high value; and conserves water.
- Consider adding sulfuric acid to control scale build up. Sulfuric acid lowers the pH and effectively converts a portion of calcium bicarbonate, the primary cause of scale, to the more soluble calcium sulfate.
- Implement a sidestream filtration system to remove sediment. These systems are useful for high turbidity supply water, airborne contaminants (e.g., oils, dust), or small passages that could clog. Filters are usually rapid sand filters or high-efficiency cartridge filters.
- Replace chemical treatments with an ozonation system, which can cause a five-fold reduction in bleed-off. Ozone treatments control scale (by reacting with mineral ions to form mineral oxides that can be precipitated in the basin or filtered) and viruses and bacteria (by killing the microbes).
- Reuse water from other areas in the facility as make-up water. For example, reuse (1) water from a once-through cooling system, (2) pretreated effluent from other processes (chemicals must be compatible with cooling tower system), or (3) high-quality municipal wastewater effluent.
The table below outlines advantages and disadvantages of options to optimize cooling tower operations.
Option |
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
Operational Improvements |
|
|
Sulfuric acid treatment |
|
|
Sidestream filtration |
|
|
Ozonation system |
|
|
Reuse of water within facility |
|
|
|
||
- NC Division of Water Quality
- NC Division of Water Resources
- WaterWiser - Water Efficiency Clearinghouse A discussion forum.
- The Water Librarian's Home Page Links to many other sites related to water.
- Toiletology 101 Information on how toilets work, how to test for leaks, valve replacement, etc.
- VendInfo Over 1,400 vendors of equipment that can be used for pollution prevention. The database can be searched by process (e.g., metal cleaning) or equipment type (e.g., air filters).
- TechInfo Bibliographic database with over 14,000 listings of pollution prevention references, is searchable by subject, title, or author and includes a brief abstract and the location of the work.
- Pollution Prevention List Servers Information on P2Tech and other pollution prevention list servers, links to previous P2Tech discussions, as well as subscriber information.
- TechInfo Listserve A free listserver for the discussion of pollution prevention. Topics range from industrial process technologies to educational materials for schools. Subscribers can post questions or respond to questions with any e-mail software. All correspondence is e-mailed to the subscribers. To subscribe: Send a message, indicating your wish to subscribe and include name and company/organization.
One Water Utility's Approach . . .In response to increased demand and limited water resources, the
Regional Water Authority of Asheville, Buncombe, and Henderson (formerly ABWA) instituted
an aggressive water efficiency program in 1991. Some of the program's initiatives include
rebates to replace older commodes with low-flow units; free retrofit kits that include
faucet aerators, a low-flow shower head, and a toilet tank displacement bag; and
literature and a video to encourage water conservation by homeowners and small businesses.
|
Often overlooked at commercial and industrial (C/I) facilities is domestic water use and the potential for significant cost savings through efficiency. Water efficiency measures should begin with the highest water use operations such as cooling, cleaning, rinsing, heating.
| Easy improvements in domestic water fixtures such as commodes, faucets, and showers are often overlooked. The quantity of domestic water use at C/I facilities may range from a small percentage at a food processing industry to over 50 percent in an office setting (Figure 1). | ![]() |
| Average daily domestic demands in C/I settings range between 20 and 35 gallons per day (gpd) per employee, but savings of 25 to 30 percent are readily achievable. | |
| A facility's assessment of domestic water use should start with the location and repair of any leaks. Pressures in the fixtures also should be checked. A leaky toilet can waste more than 50 gpd; a dripping faucet can waste 75 to 1,000 gallons per week. Outdated fixtures should be evaluated. Faucet aerators and low-flow showerheads will provide payback in less than 3 and 6 months, respectively. | |
| Replacing a 3.5-gpf toilet with a moderately priced 1.6-gpf unit will provide a payback of 1.5 to 3.5 years (Figure 2). |
|
Table 1 lists sound water efficiency choices for domestic fixtures.
Table 1. Application Guidance for Domestic Water Efficiency |
||||
Fixture |
Current Style/ Flow Rates |
Typical Ages |
Water Efficiency Options/Cost estimates |
Comments |
Commodes |
Flushometer(Flush valve) 3.5 gpf | Pre-1980's to early 1990's |
|
Must change both bowl and valve. |
Commodes |
Flushometer 4.5 gpf | Pre- 1980's |
|
Flushometer valves used in commercial, high use areas. |
Commodes |
Tanks-type/gravity 1.6 gpf | 1992 and later | Best available option | Ultra-low flush (<1.6 gpf) for special enviro-sensitive cases. |
Commodes |
Tanks-type/gravity 3.5 gpf | 1980 to mid-1990 |
|
Must replace commodes to further reduce flow. Pressurized tank styles recommended for high use areas. |
Commodes |
Tanks-type/gravity 5 - 7 gpf | Pre-1980 |
|
Do not use bricks. Consider pressurized tanks systems for high use areas. |
Urinals |
Flushometer 1.6 gpf | -- |
|
For non-pooling models. |
Urinals |
Flushometer 3.0 gpf | -- |
|
-- |
Showerhead |
2.5 gpm | Post mid-1990's |
|
Rated at 60 psi pressure. |
Showerhead |
3 - 5 gpm | Post 1980 |
|
Appropriate pressure needed. |
Showerhead |
5 - 8 gpm | Pre-1980 |
|
Appropriate pressure needed. |
Kitchen Faucets |
3 - 7 gpm | Pre-mid 1990 |
|
No less than 2.5 gpm should be used in kitchen applications. |
Lavatory Faucets |
3 - 7 gpm | Pre-mid 1990 |
|
Can go down to 0.5 gpm for bathroom wetting services |
| * Cost estimates are based on approximate installed cost using internal maintenance. Actual cost may vary. Options are based on widely available equipment believed not to reduce service quality or reliability. | ||||
Consider the following ideas to reduce the amount of water required for landscape irrigation.
The following are among the many benefits xeriscape landscaping provides:
- Reduced water use;
- Decreased energy use (because less pumping and treatment are required);
- Reduced heating and cooling costs (because trees are carefully placed); reduced stormwater runoff; fewer yard wastes; and lower labor and maintenance costs.
Source: Water Management: A Comprehensive Approach for Facility Managers. Enviro-Management & Research, Inc.
Safelite Glass manufactures windshields for the automotive industry. In order to reduce or eliminate its monitoring requirements and compliance concerns associated with its NPDES direct wastewater discharge permit, Safelite evaluated its operations and identified several major sources of wastewater. The major sources included three water-cooled air compressors, cooling water for the autoclave and hydraulic fluid, and rinse waters for the glass cutting process. As a result of this evaluation, the facility implemented the following projects.
Safelite Glass Company Wastewater Reduction Techniques |
||
Wastewater Reduction Technique |
Cost |
Annual tap and sewer water savings (million gallons) |
| Replaced two water-cooled air compressors with two electric air cooled compressors | $400,000 |
11.5 |
| Close-looped the autoclave cooling water | $200,000 |
1.5 |
| Utilized cooling water from third air compressor and hydraulic fluid cooling water for boiler make-up water | $3,000 |
8.5 |
| Installed mist nozzles for application of rinse water underneath glass | $15,000 |
4 |
| Installed triggering device on top rinse to shut off flow between glass sheets | $12,000 |
3 |
Total Wastewater Reduction |
28.5 |
|
The volume of wastewater now discharged is less than the EPA threshold that requires pollutant analysis. Although some of these activities required a high capital cost, the elimination of monitoring requirements and compliance concerns and reductions in tap water fees provided Safelite the incentive to implement the projects.
Craftsman Fabrics dyes or bleaches and then finishes cloth for knit goods manufacturers. Like many textile dyehouses, Craftsman used to dye various loads with the same volume of water and chemicals, regardless of the size. Although formulating dyebaths was easy with this method, more chemicals and water were often used than were required to properly process the fabric. To reduce water and chemical consumption and wastewater pollutants, Craftsman implemented the following modifications to the dyehouse operation:
- Installed flow meters and differential pressure transmitters on the existing dye machines.
- Modified dyehouse computer software.
- Purchased new dye machinery with the flow metering and pressure differential capabilities already installed.
Craftsman now uses less water and fewer chemicals per pound of fabric by varying the fill levels according to the machine used, size of load, and type of fabric. Thus, for an approximate capital cost of $42,000, Craftsman now saves annually approximately $170,000 in reduced water and chemical costs and increased production output. The company has also reduced wastewater use by an estimated 14 million gallons and chemical use by 0.9 million pounds annually.
While water conservation provides many benefits, a successful program can have a negative effect on wastewater compliance. Because the amount of dilution water is decreased, water conservation will increase the concentration of pollutants in the wastewater for facilities with concentration-based permit limits, mg/L. Thus, a facility may be out of compliance under the concentration-based limit although the facility is discharging the same mass of pollutants, lbs/day.
One effective solution to the problem is to implement a chemical conservation program or other reduction techniques for those chemicals that end up in the wastewater. A second solution is to work with the local water authority to switch concentration-based limits, mg/L, to mass based limits, lbs/day. Many companies have already successfully switched their limits to mass-based.
To determine the mass of pollutants discharged in the wastewater, the facility will need an effluent flow meter to record the daily wastewater flow. The flow, along with the effluent analysis, is used to determine the actual pounds of pollutant discharged. Although there is a capital investment for the flow meter, the cost of the meter is typically paid back quickly in reduced sewer fees for facilities with evaporative losses.
Ground-level ozone, the major component of smog, is produced primarily from industrial activities and gasoline burning vehicles. Ground-level ozone is harmful to humans, especially the young, elderly, and individuals with respiratory illnesses. Urban and surrounding areas that are heavily industrialized and populated typically have the highest ozone concentrations and are the most regulated.
With the potential onset of more stringent air quality standards for ozone, the North Carolina Division of Air Quality (DAQ) has recently created the NC Air Awareness Program. The education and outreach components of the program will inform the general public, business/industry, and school children about air pollution, its causes and effects and prevention techniques. When the potential exists for the ozone standards to be exceeded, DAQ will announce Ozone Action Days through newspapers, television, radio, and local employers. To help reduce the number of vehicles driven on those days, DAQ encourages car pooling, telecommuting, and eating in at lunch time, whenever possible. For further information on NC Air Awareness, call 1-888-RU4NCAIR.
North Carolina industries use an impressive variety of recycled feedstock - from common post-consumer materials such as paper fiber to post-industrial materials such as chemicals and textiles. Manufacturers may choose to incorporate recycled materials into their processes because of cost savings, locally available raw materials, the environmental benefits, and customer demand. In a recent survey of North Carolina plastic manufacturers conducted by the NC Recycling Business Assistance Center (RBAC), 91 percent of the respondents cited cost savings in raw material purchases as a major reason the company uses recycled feedstock. And although the survey identified quality concerns as a barrier to the use of recycled feedstock, some companies reported that recycled feedstock improves their product quality.
North Carolina companies should evaluate their feedstock use to determine if opportunities exist to incorporate recycled material into their processes and if such a change could improve their competitiveness. For additional information on this topic, contact the RBAC at (919) 715-6500.
The NC Division of Waste Management policy bans absorbents containing oil from North Carolina solid waste landfills. However, the Division does not ban absorbents used to clean up incidental spills of petroleum products such as small volume leaks or spills at service stations, auto dealers, and garages that can be readily cleaned up. Larger volumes of absorbents should be handled through waste oil dealers or hazardous waste service companies.
Here are tips to prevent or reduce the generation of waste absorbents:
- Use drip pans,
- Keep lids closed on containers to prevent spills, and
- Consider reusable or microbial absorbents.
One company that provides an oil absorbent mat or sock rental service picks up the used mats and extracts the oil at its plant. The mats are then laundered and reused.
Contact the Hazardous Waste Section at (919) 733-2178 or the DPPEA at (919) 715-6500 for more information on absorbent management or alternatives.
All air permit holders are required to report their "1996 North Carolina Air Emissions Inventory" to the applicable regional Air Quality Office by June 30, 1997. Pollutants subject to the reporting are the criteria pollutants, North Carolina toxic air pollutants, and federal hazardous air pollutants as listed in the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments.
To obtain an accurate emissions figure, look at processes, products, and quality of products used over the last year, as well as Material Safety Data Sheets. The Division of Air Quality has spreadsheets for a number of processes (e.g., sawmills, boilers, furnaces) and can assist with locating emission factors, if needed.
If you need assistance or have questions, contact your regional air quality staff or the Office of the Small Business Ombudsman at 1-800-829-4841. This Office provides free, confidential, technical environmental assistance to small businesses.
Conference/Workshop |
Location |
Date (1997) |
Contact |
| Process Solutions Recovery & Recycle Info Exchange | Arlington, VA | June 17-18 | Kathy Noll, CTC 814-269-6859 |
| ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Industry | Saratoga Springs, NY | July 8-11 | Debbie Giallombardo, ACEEE, 202-429-8873 |
| Engineering Solutions to Indoor Air Quality Problems | Raleigh, NC | July 21-23 | Air & Waste Mgmt. Assn., 412-232-3444 |
| U.S. Dept. of Energy 13th Annual Pollution Prevention Conference: Spotlighting Success | Atlanta, GA | August 26-28 | Conference Information Hotline: 888-660-P213 or http://www.p2xiii.org |
| Small Quantity Hazardous Waste Generator Courses | NC: Wilmington, Raleigh, Winston-Salem, Mooresville | August -TBA | Linda Culpepper, Hazardous Waste Section, 919-733-2178, ext. 216 |
| Southern States Annual Environmental Conference. | Biloxi, MS | September 23-25 | Mississippi State University - MISSTAP 601-325-8069 |
The North Carolina Division of Pollution Prevention and Environmental Assistance provides free, non-regulatory technical assistance and training to eliminate, reduce, or recycle wastes before they become pollutants or require disposal. For additional information about any of your waste reduction concerns, contact DPPEA at (919) 715-6500 or 800-763-0136 or e-mail nowaste@p2pays.org.